Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:35 PM
I am a Labour voter, but I believe good policy is good policy, regardless of who comes out with it.
Steve was nice enough to personally write to me when I aired my disgust over the lax treatment of yet another graffiti offender covered in the West Australian recently.
Knowing that he is a resident in the area he works for to me is a big plus.
I am hoping to meet with him at some point, perhaps with some friends, to openly discuss this issue in a group.
I live in East Cannington and see the way places like Carousel Shopping Centre and the various train stations along the line turn into war-zones after dark.
I have thought a lot about what can be done, but to be honest there are a number of variables here, and unfortunately if any one of them is not handled adequately, it negates the work done in the other areas.
I ask a simple question: "How many of these offenders are repeat offenders?" Its a valid question because I believe the answers stem from this.
Unlike many people who have posted on this forum thus far, I do not believe the Police are to blame. Their effectiveness is nullified the moment the judiciary lacks the courage to deal with the offenders harshly the first time.
See, I dont believe there is such a thing as 'petty' crime, Nor for that matter, 'major' crime. There is only CRIME, and its insensitive to think that somebody getting their family heirloon stolen is less important than a bank being robbed.
One look at everyones situation above tells me that 99% of their issues are stemming from what the police and judiciary would call 'petty' crime. Break-ins, graffiti, vandalism - The very building blocks of later criminal behavior are being ignored by those in power, or dismissed as "too big a problem" Do they not see that this activity leads to the larger crimes later in life?
I understand some people are desperate financially, bored, alienated, depressed... But there is right and there is wrong and Im fairly certain that a would-be offender knows the risks that faces him or her, should they decide to commit a crime. The problem is, when they are caught and these punishments are NOT handed down, what dis-incentive is there to commit another crime?
Dont be fooled. These 'petty-crime' candidates are not necessarily coming from broken/poor homes, and from what Ive been told, some of them even act on behalf of older and more experienced crime syndicates.
The key I believe is in the age of the offenders - young kids are impressionable. How you leave the right impression on them would have to vary, but we need to start getting tougher on the 'smaller' crimes. These kids either have to see the benefit of staying on the path, and if not, sincerely fear stepping off it.
Any politician ready to get up and take a stand (partiularly at our court system) will get my full support and vote.
Enough is enough.